chore: Format HTML in books/core

books/core/45.html

@@ -1,13 +1,51 @@
-    <link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/book-page.css">
-<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/book-page.css">
+<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/book-page.css" />
+<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/book-page.css" />
 <h2>SUCCESS AND FAILURE</h2>
 <p>Keep the following in mind when you describe the impact of a Check:</p>
 <ul>
-<li><strong>Never subvert the outcome.</strong> No matter the premise, the outcome of the Check must be applied for what it is. No one at the table can turn a failure into a success and vice versa: otherwise, why would dice be rolled in the first place?</li>
-<li><strong>Relevant success.</strong> If a character succeeds at a Check, they have confronted the odds and emerged victorious. The Game Master shouldn’t call for further Checks to “confirm” their success: they have earned it. <p>If you think an objective requires multiple Checks, use a Clock (see page 52).</p></li>
-<li><strong>No do-overs.</strong> Just like a success should not require further confirmation, a failure means you can't "try again" unless the situation is drastically altered in some way.<p>This rule allows Player Characters to turn failure into success, but it comes at a steep price. When a character fails a Check, anyone may propose a success at a cost. The Game Master can make adjustments to the cost as they see fit, and then the Player who performed the Check can accept or refuse.</p><p>When determining whether a given cost would be appropriate, remember that it should put the character in a rough spot or take something important away from them. If a cost can be remedied with little effort, something is wrong.</p><p>Back to the previous example: The High Master might listen to Brigid's reasons, but only if she publicly apologizes and admits that Relde's scholars are better than her.</p></li>
+  <li>
+    <strong>Never subvert the outcome.</strong> No matter the premise, the
+    outcome of the Check must be applied for what it is. No one at the table can
+    turn a failure into a success and vice versa: otherwise, why would dice be
+    rolled in the first place?
+  </li>
+  <li>
+    <strong>Relevant success.</strong> If a character succeeds at a Check, they
+    have confronted the odds and emerged victorious. The Game Master shouldn’t
+    call for further Checks to “confirm” their success: they have earned it.
+    <p>
+      If you think an objective requires multiple Checks, use a Clock (see page
+      52).
+    </p>
+  </li>
+  <li>
+    <strong>No do-overs.</strong> Just like a success should not require further
+    confirmation, a failure means you can't "try again" unless the situation is
+    drastically altered in some way.
+    <p>
+      This rule allows Player Characters to turn failure into success, but it
+      comes at a steep price. When a character fails a Check, anyone may propose
+      a success at a cost. The Game Master can make adjustments to the cost as
+      they see fit, and then the Player who performed the Check can accept or
+      refuse.
+    </p>
+    <p>
+      When determining whether a given cost would be appropriate, remember that
+      it should put the character in a rough spot or take something important
+      away from them. If a cost can be remedied with little effort, something is
+      wrong.
+    </p>
+    <p>
+      Back to the previous example: The High Master might listen to Brigid's
+      reasons, but only if she publicly apologizes and admits that Relde's
+      scholars are better than her.
+    </p>
+  </li>
 </ul>
-<p>You cannot succeed at a cost if your character fumbled the Check. When you succeed at a cost, the Check's High Roll and Result remain the same.</p>
+<p>
+  You cannot succeed at a cost if your character fumbled the Check. When you
+  succeed at a cost, the Check's High Roll and Result remain the same.
+</p>
 
 <h3>OPTIONAL: SUCCESS AT A COST</h3>
-<p>Philip Forlenza (Order #)</p>
+<p>Philip Forlenza (Order #)</p>